<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Urbanism: Planning healthier cities and retrofitting suburbia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newurbanhabitat.com/2009/07/16/new-urbanism-planning-healthier-cities-and-retrofitting-suburbia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newurbanhabitat.com/2009/07/16/new-urbanism-planning-healthier-cities-and-retrofitting-suburbia/</link>
	<description>Simple, healthy, and sustainable city living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Urban Habitat in 2010 &#171; New Urban Habitat</title>
		<link>http://newurbanhabitat.com/2009/07/16/new-urbanism-planning-healthier-cities-and-retrofitting-suburbia/#comment-2553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Urban Habitat in 2010 &#171; New Urban Habitat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newurbanhabitat.com/?p=636#comment-2553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Urbanism: Planning healthier cities and retrofitting suburbia [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Urbanism: Planning healthier cities and retrofitting suburbia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons in Car-Free Living &#171; New Urban Habitat</title>
		<link>http://newurbanhabitat.com/2009/07/16/new-urbanism-planning-healthier-cities-and-retrofitting-suburbia/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lessons in Car-Free Living &#171; New Urban Habitat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newurbanhabitat.com/?p=636#comment-1875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Urbanism: Planning Healthier Cities and Retrofitting Suburbia [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Urbanism: Planning Healthier Cities and Retrofitting Suburbia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look Up: What is New Urbanism &#171; Roads are made by Traveling</title>
		<link>http://newurbanhabitat.com/2009/07/16/new-urbanism-planning-healthier-cities-and-retrofitting-suburbia/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Look Up: What is New Urbanism &#171; Roads are made by Traveling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newurbanhabitat.com/?p=636#comment-1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read this article on New Urban Habitat a while back. I thought it was interesting and I think you would like it if you&#8217;re not into [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read this article on New Urban Habitat a while back. I thought it was interesting and I think you would like it if you&#8217;re not into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newurbanhabitat</title>
		<link>http://newurbanhabitat.com/2009/07/16/new-urbanism-planning-healthier-cities-and-retrofitting-suburbia/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newurbanhabitat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newurbanhabitat.com/?p=636#comment-1028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a great article about Penalosa for anyone who wants to read more about Bogota.

http://shareable.net/blog/can-we-design-cities-for-happiness]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a great article about Penalosa for anyone who wants to read more about Bogota.</p>
<p><a href="http://shareable.net/blog/can-we-design-cities-for-happiness" rel="nofollow">http://shareable.net/blog/can-we-design-cities-for-happiness</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://newurbanhabitat.com/2009/07/16/new-urbanism-planning-healthier-cities-and-retrofitting-suburbia/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newurbanhabitat.com/?p=636#comment-541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Careful before holding Bogota up too high - while Peñalosa is to be rightly praised for making public transit a priority, giving transit up to half of existing road-space, and TransMilenio is truly something to behold (it really is it&#039;s own mode) -  Bogota has other major problems. 

Older districts are dense (think central Paris and then some), mixed-use , have shorter blocks,  often lushly planted medians, and support living needs locally - all in all exceptionally livable. Groceries, book stores, music stores, medical services, some office buildings, clothing shops, etc. are all often just a few blocks away, albeit at different scales. Unfortunately later development, especially after the 1960s has been developed on a highway-like arterial pattern, and is rampant with the highrise-version of suburban gated communities. Essentially all little islands of 99% residential-use buildings scattered on vast wide open spaces, there is no pedestrian integration with the surrounding areas just the immediate surroundings (and no destinations to go to anyhow). There are giant blocks, there is no acknowledgment of the human scale. Not only do people have to travel for work, but to do just about anything else  - this development form has generated immense demand/need for motorised travel and reinforces the car-boom that the city is currently experiencing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful before holding Bogota up too high &#8211; while Peñalosa is to be rightly praised for making public transit a priority, giving transit up to half of existing road-space, and TransMilenio is truly something to behold (it really is it&#8217;s own mode) &#8211;  Bogota has other major problems. </p>
<p>Older districts are dense (think central Paris and then some), mixed-use , have shorter blocks,  often lushly planted medians, and support living needs locally &#8211; all in all exceptionally livable. Groceries, book stores, music stores, medical services, some office buildings, clothing shops, etc. are all often just a few blocks away, albeit at different scales. Unfortunately later development, especially after the 1960s has been developed on a highway-like arterial pattern, and is rampant with the highrise-version of suburban gated communities. Essentially all little islands of 99% residential-use buildings scattered on vast wide open spaces, there is no pedestrian integration with the surrounding areas just the immediate surroundings (and no destinations to go to anyhow). There are giant blocks, there is no acknowledgment of the human scale. Not only do people have to travel for work, but to do just about anything else  &#8211; this development form has generated immense demand/need for motorised travel and reinforces the car-boom that the city is currently experiencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

